Monday 10 June 2013

Originality in the Past



                How many people do you think would still visit You Tube if there was a fee per view or a fee to become a member? Would you continue to visit the site or would you just visit less often? I know I wouldn’t pay. Unfortunately, the fact that there is already a mechanism in place to pay for postings that generate a certain number of views is an indication that we are heading in that direction. YouTube, once a central source for all types of creative, entertaining, educational and information works, will gradually become a clearing house for cheap attention grabbing sound bite videos created for the sole purpose of generating hits.
                You are right in saying that copyright issues are bigger in the new media age. This I believe is due to the fact that it is now so much easier to edit work than to create it. There is a lot more effort put in when something is original, but with the technology these days, it is really easy to take a video, edit a few things and post for yourself. An issue that also comes up is work being created freely, and then someone else takes it and tries to gain a profit. This is the main cause for copyrights; protection of the original artist. The person that creates something should also have the right to profit from it and to determine who else, if anyone can also profit from it. If you created something for which there was a huge demand, would you be okay with someone else profiting from it instead of you? Of course not!
                I would personally like to see You Tube maintain its original purpose. Unfortunately, the more it tends toward being a commodity itself, the more it needs postings that will generate profit. I personally feel that when posting on You Tube or any free site, the work should be based upon wanting to voice an opinion or helping to inform others. Unfortunately, more and more we are seeing postings created specifically for entertainment; a quick trill. I feel there are already enough venues for entertainment. Let’s try and keep You Tube unique in the world of education and information. It has been my experience that life’s everyday trials, tribulations and happenings are the purest form of entertainment and often the funniest.
                Is it fair for our viewing to be restricted? Is it fair that we should pay for something that was once free? Take Justin Bieber for example. He was just a regular kid on You Tube posting videos of him singing. One day a celebrity came across his video and thought he was talented…now he is a celebrity. Now that he is a celebrity we need to pay for his music, concerts, videos, and even to just see him. Is it right that just because he now makes millions off his music and people think he is famous, that we should be paying to hear him? We used to be able to hear him sing the same way on You Tube, so what makes him more privileged than other You Tube posters? I guess the answer is, demand. Once his work became popular and people were willing to pay to see him, he had a right to profit from that; but it was his right; not the owners of You Tube. As I said before, it is the creator that should profit; not those who stand on their shoulders.
Overall, I feel that copyrights are a good thing. Might not sound like it from what I have talked about. But I believe that people should get the credit for what they had come up with originally. No one should be able to take credit for someone else’s work. This has always been the case and modern technology doesn’t change it. If I’m going to buy a Rembrandt I want the original; not a knock-off.

No comments:

Post a Comment